Nor does Italy present a more encouraging picture. Ariosto, one of the few names, ancient or modern, who is allowed on all hands to occupy the first rank of Literature, is, I suppose, rightly arraigned by the author I have above quoted, of “coarse sensuality.” Pulci, “by his sceptical insinuations, seems clearly to display an intention of exposing religion to contempt.” Boccaccio, the first of Italian prose-writers, had in his old age touchingly to lament the corrupting tendency of his popular compositions; and Bellarmine has to vindicate him, Dante, and Petrarch, from the charge of virulent abuse of the Holy See. Dante certainly does not scruple to place in his Inferno a Pope, whom the Church has since canonized, and his work on Monarchia is on the Index. Another great 去书内

  • GGBond123 GGBond123

    意大利也没有呈现出更令人鼓舞的局面。Ariosto是为数不多的几个名字之一,无论是古代还是现代,他都被允许占据文学的第一位,我想,我上面引用的作者正确地指出,他是“粗俗的感性”。Pulci“通过他怀疑的暗示,似乎清楚地表明了他蔑视宗教的意图。”薄伽丘是意大利第一位散文作家,他在晚年曾感人地哀叹他流行作品的腐败倾向;贝拉明必须为他、但丁和彼特拉克辩护,使其免受恶意虐待罗马教廷的指控。但丁当然毫不犹豫地在他的地狱中放置了一位教皇,此后教会将其封为圣徒,他在君主制方面的工作也在索引上。另一个伟大的

    2024-12-23 喜欢(0) 回复(0)